The heightened scrutiny stems from recent revelations about USAID's funding allocations, particularly in areas such as media training and advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights. Critics argue that some of these programs clash with local cultural values and development priorities.
In August 2024, USAID pledged an additional $24.5 million (approximately Rs. 7.2 billion) to Sri Lanka to support market-based growth, environmental sustainability, and good governance initiatives. However, critics believe a thorough audit is necessary to ensure that the funds are used in alignment with the country’s cultural context and genuine development needs.
The debate gained momentum on February 4, 2025, when Member of Parliament Namal Rajapaksa urged the government to launch an investigation into USAID-funded projects. Rajapaksa highlighted concerns raised by NGOs, media representatives, and politicians about the potential misuse of foreign aid. He also called for the implementation of long-discussed regulations on NGO funding to promote transparency and accountability.
Just days later, on February 9, National Freedom Front (NFF) leader Wimal Weerawansa called for a broader investigation into US involvement in Sri Lanka. Weerawansa linked USAID's activities to the 2022 "Aragalaya" protests, which led to the resignation of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa. He warned that USAID’s support for journalist training could be a tool for political interference and manipulation.
The controversy coincides with significant developments in the United States. On February 3, 2025, President Donald Trump ordered a suspension of foreign aid, leading to job losses for over 1,000 USAID employees and contractors. Subsequently, Elon Musk, now serving as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), announced plans to dismantle USAID, labeling it an "irredeemable criminal organization." The agency’s senior officials were placed on leave, and its official website was taken offline.
Amid these developments, Sri Lankan stakeholders emphasize the need for a balanced approach that protects the nation’s sovereignty while fostering beneficial international partnerships. The circulation of the alleged beneficiary list has further fueled public debate, with critics demanding full disclosure of the individuals and organizations involved.
As the discussions unfold, the spotlight remains on USAID’s role in Sri Lanka’s development landscape, with growing pressure on the government to act swiftly and decisively.
0 Comments